3 - 55 PASSENGER/EA "EVACUATION BUSES" FOR "MULTIPLE" LOCATIONS IN VIRGINIA (BY THE STATE DEPARTMENT).
SPECIAL DISCLOSURE.
AWARDED TO US COACHWAYS (BUSES WITH DRIVERS).
NO DATE OF USE LISTED.

award https://www.fbo.gov/index?s=opportunity&mode=form&id=1980827ccd8cc11b833f5dc735774c8b&tab=core&_cview=1
originalsypnosis https://www.fbo.gov/index?s=opportunity&mode=form&tab=core&id=d076c028add576855317be5bcdac6f95&_cview=0
go to the fedbid sow linked
on the original for more information


 
 
https://www.fbo.gov/index?s=opportunity&mode=form&id=92de4a7bab1a7a17bbe94839f6a36776&tab=core&_cview=1
MCCORD WA AFB MOVING AND RELOCATION OF OFFICE EQUIPMENT $25.5MIL
CONTRACT 42 HOURS TO MOVE - TO FORT RILEY, KANSAS (?).. SOLICITATION CANCELLED ON JULY 26 BUT ACTIVE ON FEDBID
 
 
DON'T TREAD ON ME - Tea Party Truths

When the second wave of (originally organized in
  2006/2007) Tea Parties and related liberty groups popped up in 2009 it was
every  group for themselves. It took a little while for networking between
various  groups to get going. Everyone was looking for and trying to create hubs
where  organizers could make plans together as far as dates on events and what
was  helping their group or just for therapy purposes - because being an
organizer is  a lot more stressful than it may sound.
Of course, I have to make room for  the fact that there are different types of organizers too... I
don't want to speak FOR anyone but I have seen a LOT.

Different types of organizers:

1.  those Out to make a name for themselves or posturing for a
higher position  somewhere

2. the Republican astroturf (there's just no nice
way to say it - it exists)

3. the Totally clueless (most of which have either
allowed their  groups to be co opted by the republicans or have lost all their
members due to a  lack of substance)

4. Those who think they get the big picture

5. Then there are those of us who are still committed to
nonpartisanship and focus on actually educating people - encouraging them to
research, educate themselves and  spread the word to others.
For us, it's not about rallies or who's group is the biggest... we work on a local level within our
communities ignoring the established top down organizations on the state and
national levels because they  don't KNOW our community. They have no personal
relationships with these people.  They just want numbers.
It's kind of funny that those of us who focus on  education - we didn't jump into these positions
intentionally. It was either  accidental or thrown at us. We had  no idea where
this would lead or the  responsibility we were being saddled with. It's a lot to
take on... especially  when you never asked for it. But everything happens for a
reason.

So  having that background on the behind the scenes of liberty
groups, here are a  few more details you probably didn't know...

"Tea Party Patriots"  established themselves as THE site for organizers to try to
connect... but the  leadership there wouldn't let us have eachothers contact
information - oh and  they wanted the contact information for everyone on our
local group lists.  Unfortunately for the movement, there were those who handed
over the private  information of others and allowed their groups to be coopted.
Unfortunately for  Tea Party Patriots, there are those of us who didn't and the
truth is getting  out.




Tea Party Patriots Investigated: "They Use You and Abuse You"
Zuma/Manny  Crisostomo.  Monday, Feb 14, 2011
Pricey political consultants, constant  fundraising, fame-seeking leaders: A grassroots
group cozies up to the DC  establishment and alienates the activists who put it
on the map. Part 1 of  3.
— By Stephanie Mencimer
Two years ago, Tea Party Patriots got its start  as a scrappy, ground-up conservative organization. Its rowdy activists demanded  more transparency and less business-as-usual in the
nation's capital, and they  worked hard to elect candidates who they believed
wouldn't succumb to the ways  of Washington. But it didn't take long for the
grassroots tea party organization  to embrace the DC establishment—and some of
its more questionable  practices.
Lately, Tea Party Patriots (TPP) has started to resemble the  Beltway lobbying operations its members have denounced.
The [national] group's leaders have  cozied up to political insiders implicated in the Jack
Abramoff lobbying scandal  and have paid themselves significant salaries. TPP
accepted the use of a private  jet and a large donation of anonymous cash right
before a key election, and its  top officials have refused to discuss how the
money was spent. And recently, the  group has hired several big-time fundraising
and public relations firms that  work for the who's who of the Republican
political class, including some of the  GOP's most secretive campaign
operations.
As TPP's leaders entrench  themselves in Washington, local
activists the group represents have accused them  of exploiting the grassroots
for their own fame and fortune while failing to  deliver any meaningful
political results. "Tea Party Patriots? I can't attribute  one victory to them
at all," says Laura Boatright, a former TPP regional  coordinator in Southern
California who has become an outspoken critic. "Where's  the success with what
they've done with all this money? My view is that it's  just a career plan" for
its national leaders—namely Jenny Beth Martin, who in  2010 was named by Time as
one of the 100 most influential people in the world,  and Mark Meckler, now a
regular commentator on Fox News. (Meckler and Martin did  not respond to a
request to comment for this story.)
In August, TPP inked a  contract with MDS
Communications, an Arizona-based phone fundraising firm that  counts as clients
the Republican National Committee and most of the GOP's  congressional campaign
organizations. MDS even handled the telephone fundraising  for the Bush-Cheney
reelection campaign. The firm specializes in working with  the GOP's evangelical
foot soldiers, including the National Right to Life  Committee, Concerned Women
for America, and the Family Research Council. It has  been heavily involved in
anti-gay marriage activities, once donating its  services to help raise more
than $7 million for Arizona's Proposition 102, which  created a state ban on gay
marriage.
"Tea Party Patriots? I can't attribute  one victory to them at
all," says Laura Boatright, a former TPP regional  coordinator.
The MDS deal with TPP is anything but cheap. Documents filed  with the Colorado secretary of
state indicate that MDS will keep at least 70  percent of the money it
raises—nearly $3 out of every $4. In 2005, California's  attorney general
released a report (PDF) showing that MDS was among a number of  fundraising
companies that returned less than 15 percent of what they raised to  some of the
charities they worked for. Out of more than $585,000 MDS pulled in  for the
Concerned Women for America, for instance, not a dime went back to the
  nonprofit group, according to the report.
TPP's leaders negotiated a similar deal with Capitol Resources, the most formidable GOP phone fundraising operation in the presidential bellwether state of Iowa. Corporate filings show
the company  will keep 75 percent of the money it raises hitting up tea partiers
for  donations.
The firm's owner, Nicole Schlinger, is a longtime GOP operative.  She was the finance director of the Iowa Republican Party in the late 1990s, and  she directed Mitt Romney's victorious 2007 Iowa presidential straw poll  campaign. Schlinger also served as the original president and sole
board member  of the American Future Fund, an outside expenditure group that
spent millions  from anonymous donors during the 2010 midterms attacking
Democratic candidates.  (Earlier this month, the watchdog group Citizens for
Responsibility and Ethics  in Washington asked the IRS to investigate the group
for allegedly violating its  tax-exempt status.)
Rounding out TPP's new stable of political consultants is  the Richard Norman Company, a Virginia-based direct-mail fundraising and PR  firm. Norman, like the other firms on TPP's
payroll, represents some of the  country's most prominent GOP players, including
the political action committee  of former uber-lobbyist and current Mississippi
Gov. Haley Barbour.
TPP has  long insisted that it wants to avoid divisive
social issues like abortion to  focus on the core values of fiscal
responsibility and limited government. But in  hiring the Norman firm (and MDS,
too), it has joined the ranks of a long list of  evangelical organizations
affiliated with the far-right wing that are  represented by the
company.
Norman clients include the Foundation for Moral  Law, the group
founded by the defrocked Alabama Supreme Court judge Roy Moore,  who was kicked
out of office for his refusal to remove a Ten Commandments  sculpture from his
courtroom. Also on the firm's client roster are several  anti-immigration
groups, including the Minuteman Civil Defense Corps. Norman  even represents a
group headed by birther Gary Kreep.

Next page:  Activists feel like
fundraising marks-not partners in a movement.

TPP's  new coterie of consultants and fundraisers may put the group in a new league  politically—but they have sparked bitter complaints by affiliated tea party  groups, whose
members are tired of being hounded for money. Some see TPP  morphing into the
very type of slick, DC-centric special interest group they  have been fighting
against.
In an interview with Congress.com last month,  TPP's Martin tried to
play down such notions. "Any possible solutions that we  come up with,
especially policy related, we're going to go back to the local  coordinators and
say, 'Do you agree with this?'" she said.
Rank-and-file tea  partiers aren't buying it. Last month, Jeanie Backus Coates, then the New Mexico  state coordinator for TPP, sent out an urgent email to her grassroots  compatriots
warning that TPP was using telemarketers to raise money from local  activists.
In a January 13 email, she wrote:
The Tea Party Patriots national  website
clearly states that 100% of the funds raised go to furthering OUR  efforts.
Well, I guess that's true AFTER paying out salaries, consultants,
  telemarketers, attorneys, etc...
And yes, Jenny Beth and [coordinator] Mark
  Meckler hired a consultant without most of us even knowing about it and now
that  consultant has encouraged and those two have decided to start soliciting
  donations from our own local tea party participants so that they can pay
  themselves, their consultant, their telemarketers, and their
  attorneys.
Coates was particularly angered because the national TPP leaders
  have relentlessly pressured local affiliates to turn over their valuable
  membership contact lists to the national organization, which the group is now
  using to sic telemarketers on tea partiers.
The list controversy dates back
  to September, when TPP announced that it had received a $1 million grant from
an  anonymous donor to conduct get out the vote work before the midterm
elections.  The money was distributed to local tea party groups, but initially
only on the  condition that they turn over their membership lists to the
national  organization, a move that raised suspicions that TPP intended to sell
this  valuable data. (Fueling these suspicions was the fact that Meckler works
for a  lead-generation company that provides email contacts to companies often
  considered to be pyramid schemes.)

"They make it seem like they help  local groups. None of that money ever goes back to local groups."

Now, activists are furious to discover that TPP is leveraging those lists to mine
tea  partiers for money that will fund such things as Meckler and Martin's
salaries,  a winter conference in Phoenix, and of course, the high-priced
fundraisers  themselves.
Disgruntled former TPP volunteers and activists say
that rather  than partners in a movement, they have increasingly come to feel
like  fundraising marks. TPP's fundraising appeals, they say, can be quite
  deceptive.
One sent out recently by TPP's Martin pleads with "patriots" to
  donate to pay for sound-stage equipment, event security, travel expenses for
  speakers, and other tea party rally trappings. She promises that the money will
  fund the group's efforts to meet with local tea party groups and "to give them
  the advice, direction, and the logistical support they need to get off the
  ground." Respondents can return a form pre-addressed to Martin that reads,
"Dear  Jenny Beth, Thank you for sacrificing your former way of life to fight
for our  liberty and for the core values and principles our great nation was
founded  on."
Some tea partiers point out that Martin's "way of life" has
improved  considerably since she started making a reported $6,000 a month as
TPP's  national coordinator. Before she became a tea party star, she was working
as a  maid, scrubbing toilets for Atlanta suburbanites after her husband's
company  went belly up.
Cindy Chafian, the co-coordinator of California's
Chino Hills  Tea Party in California, used to donate monthly to TPP. She has
since grown  disillusioned with the group and its leaders. Far from helping
local activists  like her, Chafian says, TPP's fundraising efforts are actually
diverting  resources from the local groups that need them. "They make it seem
like they  help local groups," she says. "None of that money ever goes back to
local  groups."
TPP's nonstop fundraising efforts have reached the point
where the  group's weekly conference calls with activists have turned into
little more than  telethons, says the organization's former Georgia state
coordinator, Joy McGraw.  And, far from bolstering local groups, the national
organization has left them  holding the bag for bills they incur advancing the
movement. Such was the case  with McGraw, who says she arranged an event
attended by Martin and Meckler that  featured GOP talking head Dick Morris.
McGraw says Martin had her deal with all  the logistics for the event, even
signing contracts for catering and other  expenses, but refused to let her
handle any of the money raised to pay for it,  including through ticket sales.
When the $5,000 catering bill came due, the  national coordinators refused to
pay, she says. When creditors began to come  after her, McGraw was forced to
raise money from fellow activists to pay off the  debt.
"Tea Party Patriots
don't really do anything for the local groups," she  says."There are a lot of
frustrated people. There are a lot of other people in  the country who've done
events and have gotten screwed over. We are all  volunteers. We do not get paid
like [Martin] does. They don't say, 'Thank you.'  They use you and abuse
you."**
The money TPP has raised is significant, and  the hiring of
professional fundraisers should only help matters. According to a  financial
statement filed with the Colorado secretary of state, TPP raised  $538,009
between June 1, 2009, and May 31, 2010. It would later receive the $1  million
donation. Given the amount of cash that has sloshed through TPP's  coffers in
the past two years, much of it from individual grassroots donors,  many
activists have begun to wonder how it's been spent by an organization that
  doesn't even have an office. Yet TPP has proven virtually inscrutable, and its
  leaders have refused to answer the question: Where's all the money
  going?
TOMORROW: TPP says it's a nonprofit political charity. "News to us,"
  says the IRS.
**Update 2/14/10 Mother Jones asked a tea party spokesman to
  comment on this story last week but did not get a response. After the story was
  published, Debbie Dooley, a TPP national coordinator in Georgia, emailed Mother
  Jones disputing McGraw's account of events, saying that McGraw approached TPP
  about doing the event with Dick Morris and offered to sign a contract pledging
  to handle all the expenses and debt from the event, in exchange for taking a 15
  percent cut of any profits, with the rest going to the Atlanta Tea
  Party.
Source:
  http://motherjones.com/politics/2011/02/tea-party-patriots-investigated

Tea Party Patriots Investigated: Don’t
  Ask, Don’t Tell
Zuma/Pete Marovich.  Tue, Feb 15, 2011
The
  nation's largest tea party group wants your money. Just don't inquire about
  where it's going. Part 2 of 3.
— By Stephanie Mencimer
The nation's
  largest tea party group, Tea Party Patriots, made a name for itself through
  raucous protests demanding more government transparency and fiscal
  responsibility. But the high standards of transparency and financial restraint
  that TPP's leaders expect from the Obama administration don't seem to apply to
  their own organization, a Mother Jones investigation has found.
TPP leaders
  have used dodgy accounting tricks to avoid publicly disclosing financial
  information. They've refused to share this information with the group's
members.  Tea partiers who've tried to pierce the veil of secrecy have found
themselves  threatened with lawsuits or shut out of the organization entirely.
And the group  has tried to buy the silence of former employees and
disillusioned board  members, offering sums as high as $20,000 to sign
confidentiality agreements.  (National TPP coordinators did not respond to
requests for comment for this  story.)
TPP has proven highly adept at raising
money, and it has hired a team  of high-priced PR consultants and GOP-connected
direct-mail and telemarketing  firms to give the group even more fundraising
firepower. Yet it has failed to  complete the simple bookkeeping chores required
of a well-managed charitable  organization.
TPP claims it is a 501(c)(4)
entity. That means the group does  not pay taxes, but donations to the group
aren't tax-deductible. Yet despite  raising millions of dollars since its
founding in February 2009, TPP has not  even applied to the IRS for such
official status, according to a TPP spokesman.  And the IRS confirms that it has
not filed paperwork that would reveal basic  information about its
finances.
"You'd think they'd lead by example, you'd  think they'd open their
books and not hide behind their tax status."

The  IRS allows nonprofits
like TPP to bill themselves as tax-exempt before they’ve  received official
approval, but they are still required to file tax forms—what  are known as
990s—publicly disclosing how much money they've raised, how much  top staff
members are paid, and generally how its funds are spent. One glance at  a 990
can often distinguish a bad nonprofit from a good one by showing how much  the
group invested in actual program expenses, as opposed to administrative  costs
like salaries and other overhead.
TPP first ratified its bylaws in  February
2009 and was incorporated in Woodstock, Georgia, that June,  self-identifying as
a 501(c)(4). Under standard charitable organizational  practices, TPP would have
filed a 990 last April or (with an IRS extension) by  November 15, 2010. It
didn't. Instead, Randy Lewis, a spokesman for the group,  says that TPP has
declared a May 31 end to its fiscal year. This means that  under IRS rules, TPP
won't have to file its first tax form for the 2009 tax year  until April 15,
2011, more than two years after its inception.
There's  nothing illegal about
what TPP is doing—but it's certainly not the action of an  outfit that welcomes
public scrutiny. Marcus Owens, a DC tax lawyer with the  firm of Caplin &
Drysdale, who served for 10 years as the director of the  Exempt Organizations
Division of the IRS, says that shifting the tax year is an  old trick used by
political groups to delay disclosure. He noted that the IRS  has said that one
of its goals this year is to crack down on this type of  foot-dragging by
charities in light of all the anonymous money flooding the  political
system.
TPP's opaque operations have raised the suspicions of some  tea
partiers who have accused the group's leaders of hypocrisy—preaching
  transparency and preventing it at the same time. "You'd think they'd lead by
  example, you'd think they'd open their books and not hide behind their tax
  status," says Laura Boatright, a former TPP regional coordinator in southern
  California who's become one of the group's loudest critics.
While TPP hasn't
  deployed its significant resources to get its books in order, many smaller tea
  party groups it counts as affiliates have. At least one—the North Houston Tea
  Party Patriots—has posted its financial information on its website for anyone
to  see. "All over the country, small tea party groups are playing by the
rules,"  says Florida tea party activist Robin Stublen, who served as a TPP
state  coordinator before becoming disenchanted with their lack of transparency.
"If  [TPP] hasn't filed their taxes, quite frankly, that's outrageous."
Even
the  Tea Party Express, which TPP national coordinator Mark Meckler has derided
as an  Astroturf group because it's run by a handful of California political
  consultants, has been more transparent than TPP. Tea Party Express, a political
  action committee, has come under fire for raising significant funds from tea
  partiers that went back to the consulting firm that organized it. But one
reason  activists were able to criticize the organization is that it had
reported its  expenditures to the Federal Election Commission, as required by
law.
Next  page: “They were eating like kings and queens on donated
money.”
TPP's  opacity has left local organizers and even some former
staffers in the dark  about what's happened to the millions of dollars the group
has raised over the  past two years. This has fueled suspicions about how
Meckler and fellow national  coordinator Jenny Beth Martin are spending the
money—and whether they are  exploiting the tea party movement for personal gain.
Martin said last summer  that she was making $6,000 a month for her work. But
activists have been unable  to officially confirm her salary or Meckler's. Asked
late last year by Mother  Jones, Meckler refused to say how much he's being
paid, though such information  is legally required to be disclosed on a
charity's tax forms.
"You are taking  money out of the pockets of local
groups and spending it on what? Rallies,  hotels, airplanes so Mark and Jenny
Beth can fly around and talk to potential  donors? It's
ridiculous."


To local tea party activists, Meckler and  Martin appear
to be living large (even as they churn out op-eds bashing  Republicans for not
doing enough to cut the budget). They did little to dispel  such notions in
October, when the pair jetted across the country in a private  plane to whip up
the tea party faithful ahead of the midterms. Recently, they  launched their own
slick personal websites highlighting their tea party  leadership and media
appearances—sites that are separate from the national  group's website and have
all the trappings of the work of image  consultants.
"They're acting just
like the regular GOP does," say Joy McGraw,  a former Georgia state coordinator
for TPP who spent some time in DC with its  national leaders. "They received a
million in donations; they flew around in a  private jet. Every time they stayed
in DC, they stayed in the Hyatt. They were  eating like kings and queens on
donated money."
TPP's honchos don't take  kindly to questions about how they
are spending the group's money, either, as  California tea partier Cindy Chafian
discovered the hard way. During one of the  group's weekly webinars last fall,
Chafian, the co-coordinator of the Chino  Hills Tea Party, asked some pointed
questions about why the group wasn't more  forthcoming about how it spent the $1
million donation. Afterwards, her tea  party group was deleted from the TPP
website and she was blocked from further  calls. She subsequently sent a letter
to TPP's board raising her concerns. In  it, she wrote:
When I think of what
a LOCAL GROUP could do with that money it  really makes me angry. There are many
groups who are struggling just to keep  their heads above water; your
organization should be encouraging them to keep  their money local. Instead you
are taking money out of the pockets of local  groups and spending it on what?
Rallies, hotels, airplanes so Mark and Jenny  Beth can fly around and talk to
potential donors? It's ridiculous. TPP relies on  DONATIONS from it's members to
survive…for you to waste that money is completely  unacceptable.
In return
she was threatened with a lawsuit by one of the board  members, Debbie Dooley,
who in an email called her allegations slanderous and  said, "I can tell you
that if you go public with these lies, I will obtain an  attorney personally for
myself and seek legal action against you. You are way  off base and I am glad
you are no longer associated with TPP." Dooley did not  responded to questions
from Mother Jones.
Scott Boston, TPP's onetime  national education
coordinator, says he, too, pressed for answers about the  group's finances—and
was pushed out of the group as a result. Boston says he was  offered a severance
package that was contingent on signing a nondisclosure  agreement. He declined
to sign.
Rob Gaudet, TPP's former chief technology  officer who created the
group's website as well as many of its related software  applications, was also
forced out of the organization last fall. (TPP says he  refused to follow orders
about server management; Gaudet says he was ousted for  criticizing the top
leadership and its management.) TPP offered him $20,000 to  keep quiet, he says.
Like Boston, he declined.
"Any time anybody asks about  the money, you're
immediately labeled as a problem or an adversary," says  Boatright, the southern
California tea partier. "They act like you're a  troublemaker just for
asking."
Source:
  http://motherjones.com/politics/2011/02/tea-party-patriots-investigated-part-two?page=1

Tea Party Patriots Investigated: The
  Tax-Dodging Treasurer
Pete Marovich/Zumapress.com
Why'd the
  group put a failed businessman who owes big money to the IRS in charge of its
  finances?
— By Stephanie Mencimer  Wnd, Feb 16, 2011
The finances of the
  nation's largest tea party group have increasingly become a subject of
  concern—and outrage—to conservative activists. Some question whether donations
  to the organization, Tea Party Patriots, have gone to advance the movement, or
  just the careers and jet-setting lifestyles of its leaders. What they don't
know  is that the group has had a man with an unusual background managing its
money:  He was sanctioned by the IRS several years ago for failing to pay
hundreds of  thousands of dollars in payroll taxes related to a failed business
that pushed  him into bankruptcy. He also happens to be married to one of the
group's  leaders.
For a group that has demanded financial accountability and
  transparency from the Obama administration, Tea Party Patriots (TPP) has not
  embraced those principles in its own business affairs. It has been highly
  secretive about its finances, and the organization's leaders have dealt harshly
  with activists and employees who've pressed for answers on how donor money has
  been spent.
Meanwhile, the group has failed to file a timely tax return
  indicating how much money it has raised and what, generally, it spent it
  on—including how much it's paying its top staffers. And despite identifying
  itself for nearly two years as a tax-exempt nonprofit organization, the group
  has neglected to actually apply to the IRS for such status.
"I couldn't get
  paid without contacting Lee Martin."

Former TPP insiders say the
  organization's finances have largely been managed by Lee Martin, who's
  identified in some corporate filings as the group's assistant treasurer. He's
  better known to tea partiers as the husband of Jenny Beth Martin, a cofounder
of  TPP and one of the faces of the tea party movement.
Unknown to all but a
few  tea partiers who have knowledge of TPP's internal dynamics, Martin has
taken a  wide-ranging role in the organization, managing a range of payroll and
personnel  issues. Former employees describe him as a financial gatekeeper of
sorts. "I  couldn't get paid without contacting Lee Martin," says Scott Boston,
who worked  for several months as the group's national education coordinator
before he was  let go last fall.
Ex-TPP insiders familiar with Martin's role
at TPP say  having him handle the group's bills poses a conflict of interest.
They also  question the wisdom of placing a person with a dubious financial
track record in  charge of managing the group's donated money—which, since the
group's founding  in 2009, has totaled in the millions. Much of it arrives via
small online  contributions that can create a bookkeeping nightmare.
While
Lee Martin does  have experience running a business, things did not end well for
his company. For  about eight years, Martin owned a Georgia temp company called
Indwell, which  supplied non-English speaking temporary workers to local
businesses. The company  went belly up in 2007, and Martin has blamed a former
business partner for  contributing to its demise. But while running the company
on his own, Martin  failed to pay hundreds of thousands of dollars in payroll
taxes.
Next page: “I can authorize $13,000 right away, “Lee Martin
wrote.”
By 2008, the  company's collapse had forced the Martins to file for
bankruptcy. At the time,  they were more than $1.4 million in debt. Of that,
they owed $510,000 to the IRS  and more than $172,000 to Georgia's tax
authorities. The Martins eventually lost  their home and twin Lincoln
Navigators. Before the tea party movement came along  in early 2009, Jenny Beth
was working as a maid and Lee was fixing computers to  make ends meet.
"I
think it's a huge conflict of interest to be handling all  that money when
you're in such dire straits."

While Jenny Beth took a  high-profile role
in promoting the tea party movement—Time named her one of the  100 most
influential people in the world last year—Lee Martin worked behind the  scenes
for the organization his wife helped found. Martin admits that he has  done a
lot of "back office" and administrative work for TPP, but downplays his  role
within the organization. "I'm taking care of our 7-year-old twins while my  wife
runs around the country doing tea party stuff," he says. He portrays  himself as
more paper push than treasurer, noting that he doesn't sign any  checks or make
payments. He does confirm, however, that "if people want to get  paid, the bill
goes through me for administrative purposes."
Lee Martin—who  says he is not
paid for his TPP work—doesn't just handle money matters. He's  also taken on the
role of a de facto human resources manager, as well. When TPP  fired its chief
technology officer, Rob Gaudet, in October, it was Martin who  wrote to him
offering a sizable payout to sign a nondisclosure agreement. "I can  authorize
$13,000 right away in exchange for an agreement that basically says we  will
part on good terms, support a smooth transition, and refrain from making
  negative comments about each other," Martin wrote in an instant message.
  Eventually, TPP offered him $20,000, Gaudet says, but he declined to sign the
  agreement.
Why did Martin get involved in this matter? "I used to work in
the  human resources industry," he explains. "My history in that gave me
knowledge  the group found useful."
Some tea party insiders, however, see
Martin's work  for the group as an indication that it's relying on nepotism
rather than good  management to run its affairs. In part, that's because Lee
Martin isn't the only  relative of Jenny Beth who's involved in running TPP. Her
cousin, Kevin  Mooneyhan, is a paid TPP employee.
Lee Martin says Mooneyhan,
once the  operations coordinator for his defunct temp firm, is his wife's
right-hand man,  and insists there is nothing improper about his hiring. "It
didn't have anything  to do with the fact that he was a cousin," he says. "I
think [Jenny Beth] has  about 30 cousins, he's the only one [working there], and
it's strictly because  of his qualifications and not because he's a
relative."
Martin blames  criticisms of him and TPP's leadership on
disgruntled employees and activists.  "We've got a few people who along the way
just did not work out as team  members," he says. "They're not happy about
having to be separated from the  group." This sentiment is shared by some TPP
loyalists.

"Those speaking  out against them, they are just sour
grapes," says Anthony Shreeve, a Tennessee  state coordinator for TPP.
But
Laura Boatright, a onetime TPP regional  coordinator in southern California,
says activists have good reason for concern  about Lee Martin's role in the
group. She points in particular to the Martins'  fragile financial condition. "I
think they should be worried, not only because  of his prior record dealing with
finances and having a very successful business  that went under, but I think
it's a huge conflict of interest to be handling all  that money when you're in
such dire straits."
Source:
  http://motherjones.com/politics/2011/02/tea-party-patriots-investigated-part-3?page=1


Many similar stories can be found doing  your own research.
Don't be a sheeple  - think for yourself!
 
 
EXECUTIVE ORDER:
BLOCKING PROPERTY OF TRANSNATIONAL CRIMINAL
  ORGANIZATIONS
http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2011/07/25/executive-order-blocking-property-transnational-criminal-organizations

RELATED
- Presidential Memorandum--Blocking Property of Transnational Criminal
  Organizations
http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2011/07/25/presidential-memorandum-blocking-property-transnational-criminal-organiz

RELATED
- Presidential Proclamation--Suspension of Entry of Aliens Subject to United
  Nations Security Council Travel Bans and International Emergency Economic
Powers  Act
  Sanctions
http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2011/07/25/presidential-proclamation-suspension-entry-aliens-subject-united-nations

RELATED
- MESSAGE FROM OBAMA REGARDING THE CONTINUATION OF THE NATIONAL
  EMERGENCY
http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2011/07/20/message-president-regarding-contintuation-national-emergency-respect-for

PREVIOUS:
“Section
  202(d) of the National Emergencies Act, 50 USC 1622(d), provides for the
  automatic termination of a national emergency unless, prior to the anniversary
  date of its declaration, the President publishes in the Federal Register and
  transmits to the Congress a notice stating that the emergency is to continue in
  effect beyond the anniversary date. Consistent with this provision, I have sent
  to the Federal Register the enclosed notice, stating that the emergency
declared  with respect to the terrorist attacks on the United States of
September 11,  2001, is to continue in effect for an additional
year.”

THIS year's  message of continuation:
"Section 202(d) of the
National Emergencies Act (50  U.S.C. 1622(d)) provides for the automatic
termination of a national emergency  unless, prior to the anniversary date of
its declaration, the President  publishes in the Federal Register and transmits
to the Congress a notice stating  that the emergency is to continue in effect
beyond the anniversary date.  In  accordance with this provision, I have sent
the enclosed notice to the Federal  Register for publication stating that the
national emergency and related  measures dealing with the former regime of
Charles Taylor are to continue in  effect beyond July 22, 2011."
(Only
extended it by a couple days... Just  long enough to declare a NEW emergency?
Needed more time to come up with a valid  reason that would meet IEEPA criteria?
Nice.)

INTERNATIONAL EMERGENCY  ECONOMIC POWERS ACT (IEEPA) - CODES
In
the event of an actual attack on the  United States, the president can also
confiscate property connected with a  country, group, or person that aided in
the
  attack.
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/50/usc_sup_01_50_10_35.html

NATIONAL
  EMERGENCIES ACT (NEA) TERMINATION
Any national emergency declared by the
  President in accordance with this subchapter, and not otherwise previously
  terminated, shall terminate on the anniversary of the declaration of that
  emergency if, within the ninety-day period prior to each anniversary date, the
  President does not publish in the Federal Register and transmit to the Congress
  a notice stating that such emergency is to continue in effect after such
  anniversary.
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/50/usc_sec_50_00001622----000-.html

http://www.businessinsider.com/obama-declares-organized-crime-threat-a-national-emergency-2011-7

http://inteldaily.com/2010/09/obama-declares-another-national-emergency-when-none-exists/

http://www.freedomsphoenix.com/Article/075321-2010-09-14-obama-declares-another-national-emergency-when-none-exists.htm?From=News

http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1009/28683.html

http://www.thenewamerican.com/index.php/usnews/constitution/4573-bush-obama-and-the-nine-year-emergency

http://www.wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=13091

http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/index.php?pid=55957#axzz1TNAmwN00

http://www.sweetliberty.org/issues/eo/eo12919.htm


Annex
   A:  United Nations Security Council Resolutions (UNSCRs)

1) UNSCR 1521
  (2003) (concerning Liberia):  http://www.un.org/sc/committees/1521/
2)
  UNSCR1572 (2004)) (concerning Côte d’Ivoire): 
  http://www.un.org/sc/committees/1572/resolutions.shtml
3) UNSCR 1591 (2005)
  (concerning Sudan):  http://www.un.org/sc/committees/1591/
4) UNSCR 1636
  (2005) (concerning Lebanon):  http://www.un.org/sc/committees/1636/
5) UNSCR
  1718 (2006) (concerning North Korea): 
  http://www.un.org/sc/committees/1718/
6) UNSCR 1844 (2008) (concerning
  Somalia):  http://www.un.org/sc/committees/751/
7) UNSCR 1857 (2008)
  (concerning the Democratic Republic of the Congo): 
  http://www.un.org/sc/committees/1533/
8) UNSCR 1907 (2009) (concerning
  Eritrea):  http://www.un.org/sc/committees/751/
9) UNSCR 1929 (2010)
  (concerning Iran):  http://www.un.org/sc/committees/1737/
10) UNSCR 1970 and
  1973 (2011) (concerning the Libyan Arab Jamahiriya): 
  http://www.un.org/sc/committees/1970/
11) UNSCR 1988 (2011) (concerning
  Afghanistan): http://www.un.org/sc/committees/1988/
12) UNSCR 1989 (2011)
  (concerning Al Qaeda) http://www.un.org/sc/committees/1267/

Annex B: 
  Executive Orders

1) Executive Order 12947 of January 23, 1995
  (Prohibiting Transactions With Terrorists Who Threaten to Disrupt the Middle
  East Peace Process), as amended by Executive Order 13099 of August 20, 1998
  (Prohibiting Transactions With Terrorists Who Threaten to Disrupt the Middle
  East Peace Process)
2) Executive Order 12978 of October 21, 1995 (Blocking
  Assets and Prohibiting Transactions With Significant Narcotics
  Traffickers)
3) Executive Order 13067 of November 3, 1997 (Blocking Sudanese
  Government Property and Prohibiting Transactions With Sudan)
4) Executive
  Order 13219 of June 26, 2001 (Blocking Property of Persons Who Threaten
  International Stabilization Efforts in the Western Balkans), as amended by
  Executive Order 13304 of May 28, 2003 (Termination of National Emergencies With
  Respect to Yugoslavia and Modification of Executive Order 13219 of June 26,
  2001)
5) Executive Order 13224 of September 23, 2001 (Blocking Property and
  Prohibiting Transactions With Persons Who Commit, Threaten to Commit, or
Support  Terrorism), as amended by Executive Order 13268 of July 2, 2002
(Termination of  Emergency With Respect to the Taliban and Amendment of
Executive Order 13224 of  September 23, 2001)
6) Executive Order 13288 of
March 6, 2003 (Blocking  Property of Persons Undermining Democratic Processes or
Institutions in  Zimbabwe), as amended by Executive Order 13391 of November 22,
2005 (Blocking  Property of Additional Persons Undermining Democratic Processes
or Institutions  in Zimbabwe)
7) Executive Order 13310 of July 28, 2003
(Blocking Property of  the Government of Burma and Prohibiting Certain
Transactions)
8) Executive  Order 13315 of August 28, 2003 (Blocking Property
of the Former Iraqi Regime,  Its Senior Officials and Their Family Members, and
Taking Certain Other  Actions), superseded in part by Executive Order 13350 of
July 29, 2004  (Termination of Emergency Declared in Executive Order 12722 With
Respect to Iraq  and Modification of Executive Order 13290, Executive Order
13303, and Executive  Order 13315)
9) Executive Order 13338 of May 11, 2004
(Blocking Property of  Certain Persons and Prohibiting the Export of Certain
Goods to Syria), as  amended by Executive Order 13460 of February 13, 2008
(Blocking Property of  Additional Persons in Connection With the National
Emergency With Respect to  Syria)
10) Executive Order 13348 of July 22, 2004
(Blocking Property of  Certain Persons and Prohibiting the Importation of
Certain Goods from  Liberia)
11) Executive Order 13382 of June 28, 2005
(Blocking Property of  Weapons of Mass Destruction Proliferators and Their
Supporters)
12) Executive  Order 13396 of February 7, 2006 (Blocking Property
of Certain Persons  Contributing to the Conflict in Côte d’Ivoire)
13)
Executive Order 13399 of  April 25, 2006 (Blocking Property of Additional
Persons in Connection With the  National Emergency With Respect to Syria)
14)
Executive Order 13400 of April  26, 2006 (Blocking Property of Persons in
Connection With the Conflict in  Sudan’s Darfur Region)
15) Executive Order
13405 of June 16, 2006 (Blocking  Property of Certain Persons Undermining
Democratic Processes or Institutions in  Belarus)
16) Executive Order 13412
of October 13, 2006 (Blocking Property of  and Prohibiting Transactions With the
Government of Sudan)
17) Executive  Order 13413 of October 27, 2006 (Blocking
Property of Certain Persons  Contributing to the Conflict in the Democratic
Republic of the Congo)
18)  Executive Order 13438 of July 17, 2007 (Blocking
Property of Certain Persons Who  Threaten Stabilization Efforts in Iraq)
19)
Executive Order 13441 of August  1, 2007 (Blocking Property of Persons
Undermining the Sovereignty of Lebanon or  Its Democratic Processes and
Institutions)
20) Executive Order 13448, of  October 18, 2007 (Blocking
Property and Prohibition Certain Transactions Related  to Burma)
21)
Executive Order 13460 of February 13, 2008 (Blocking Property  of Additional
Persons in Connection With the National Emergency With Respect to  Syria)
22)
Executive Order 13464 of April 30, 2008 (Blocking Property and  Prohibiting
Certain Transactions Related to Burma)
23) Executive Order 13469  of July 25,
2008 (Blocking Property of Additional Persons Undermining Democratic  Processes
or Institutions in Zimbabwe)
24) Executive Order 13536 of April 12,  2010
(Blocking Property of Certain Persons Contributing to the Conflict in
  Somalia)
25) Executive Order 13551 of August 30, 2010 (Blocking Property of
  Certain Persons With Respect to North Korea)
26) Executive Order 13566 of
  February 25, 2011 (Blocking Property and Prohibiting Certain Transactions
  Related to Libya)
27) Executive Order 13572 of April 29, 2011 (Blocking
  Property of Certain Persons With Respect to Human Rights Abuses in
Syria)
28)  Executive Order 13573 of May 18, 2011 (Blocking Property of
Senior Officials of  the Government of Syria)
29) Executive Order 13581 of
July 24, 2011 (Blocking  Property of Transnational Criminal
  Organizations)

Other:

http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2011/07/25/presidential-proclamation-suspension-entry-aliens-subject-united-nations

http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2011/09/21/message-president-congress-regarding-continuation-national-emergency-res

http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2011/09/21/notice-regarding-continuation-national-emergency-respect-persons-who-com

 
 
Proof
  of "Weather Modification" - (Must see for skeptics)
http://www.weathermodification.com
 
 
The Specifics on Fukushima & Radiation - what it means for US
Leuren
  Moret is a Nuclear Power whilstleblower who is telling all that will
  listen.
Get yourself a bite to eat and a cup of coffee then hunker down and
  listen
  up!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Be0ow2Jjs9E

http://www.tehrantimes.com/Index_view.asp?code=165352
http://www.whale.to/b/moret23.html
http://www.multistalkervictims.org/moret2citycouncil.htm





nuclear meltdown material in the air will DECAY INTO CHEMTRAIL materials.. BARIUM and
  STRONTIUM ...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p5uJSo-Ed70

here are a
  copule links on "nuclear transmutation"

you can CLEARLY see.. these
  radioactive elements WILL DECAY into barium and strontium! i.e.. the same
  substances found in / make up
  CHEMTRAILS!

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_transmutation

http://www.epa.gov/rpdweb00/radionuclides/cesium.html

http://www.google.com/search?q=barium+and+strontium+chemtrails&rls=com.microsoft:en-us:IE-SearchBox&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&sourceid=ie7

Barium
& strontium also needed for holograms (Project Blue Beam
  anyone?)

this "blue beam device" even calls for the use of BARIUM and
  STRONTIUM crystals in the air to project 3D images.. realtime for HOURS after
  the image was made.. it hangs in the air!!!

below is the link to the "3D
  imaging" text.. all about how the military will be using barium and strontium
to  "reflect" holograms for hours or DAYS in the
  atmosphere!!!
http://www.dtic.mil/cgi-bin/GetTRDoc?AD=ADA338490&Location=U2&doc=GetTRDoc.pdf



RADIATION:
EMAIL
  LISA JACKSON -head administrator of EPA
jackson.lisap@epa.gov

Sara
  DeCair-health physicist EPA's office or
  Radiation
decair.sara@epa.gov
(202)
  343-9713



It's not a constant slam of it there are
  peaks and wanes but better safe than sorry here you go:


http://www.baycitizen.org/japan-disaster/story/government-under-fire-radiatio­n-milk/1/
http://www.npl.washington.edu/monitoring/node/1
http://www.epa.gov/japan2011/rert/radnet-sampling-data.html#precipitation

Iodine-131
  Radiation found in WA: air filter, milk, drinking water & precipitation
 
 
Left or is leaving MSM/other news/entertainment affiliates:

Oprah (see her ties to Rockefeller, Gates & others), Beck
FOX, Kathleen Parker CNN, John Roberts CNN, Sue Bunda CNN, Keith Olbermann
MSNBC, Lloyd Robertson CTV, Larry King, Regis Philbin, Katie Couric, Matt lauer,
Meredith Vieira, Anne Curry, Natalie Morales